

What Does the Ruiz Deal Mean for the Galaxy?
By: Laurie | January 15th, 2008
What are the stages of grief? Anger, denial, bargaining, depression, acceptance, right?
I’m not at “acceptance” yet. (And to make my life even worse, my newly beloved team, the scrappy, bankrupt little Luton Town, are currently getting slaughtered by Liverpool. And I have a ferocious headache. It’s one of those days.)
But this isn’t about me and my gag reflex, so let’s take an unbiased look at what the Carlos Ruiz acquisition means for the Galaxy. (I think I can manage unbiased for one post. Look, see? I picked a neutral photo and not a diving one. Just recognize that it’s hard for me, okay?)
Here’s the driving force behind the acquisition: David Beckham delivers great crosses. The Galaxy last year had nobody who could get on the end of them consistently. Ruiz has the potential. He was a goal-scoring machine when he was in LA before. It could happen again.
Stats taken from Wikipedia (which is never wrong):
LA Galaxy, 2002-2005. 72 games, 50 goals. Extremely impressive. If he could do that again… Well, I’d still complain about his diving, but I’d also happily accept his presence on the team.
FC Dallas 2005-2007. 65 games, 31 goals. Not quite as high, but still impressive. Better than anyone we had last year.
Here’s one of the things that concerns me, though. Most of those goals seem to have come in the first year. His stats for last year? From the FC Dallas website: 22 games, 7 goals, one of them a PK. And two assists. At a DP salary. This would be why Dallas was ready to deal.
Ruiz is only 28. He should have at least a couple of good years still in him. With luck they will happen when he gets to LA. But that still leaves my biggest concern: Money.
Let’s not talk about total compensation, which doesn’t really matter for the team, because anything Ruiz is paid over $325,000 is paid by AEG and doesn’t affect the salary cap. (Although for the record, Ruiz was paid total compensation of $435,000 last year.) So let’s talk about the effect on the salary cap.
The cap for 2008 is reported to be $2.3 million. David Beckham, the first DP, counts $400,000 toward that. Landon Donovan and Carlos Ruiz will count $325,000 apiece. That’s $1,050,000 of salary cap taken up by three players.
My understanding (correct any factual errors if you see them) is that the team can have 10 developmental players who don’t count against the salary cap, right? And we’re also helped by the fact that Generation Adidas players don’t count, which means Israel Sesay, and possibly Quavas Kirk? (Does he still count under this rule?)
So with a roster of 28, minus the three DPs, the 10 developmentals, and the two Gen. Adidas players, we’ll need to stretch the remaining $1,250,000 across 13 players. Which is just under $100,000 apiece. The big question: Can we field a competitive team for this, particularly given the inexperience of our entire defense now that Joe Cannon is gone? (If you want to try to run some numbers for yourself, the current salary list is here.)
It’s possible. The thing is, based on what happened last year I don’t have great faith in the front office’s ability to bring in bang for the buck. They tended to throw money at players who didn’t deliver and skimp on the players that did. (Chris Klein being the big exception.)
But back to the Ruiz deal. My other big concern is the grandfathered players rule. We now own two, plus a real DP. The “grandfather” rule was extended, but just for one season, right? So what happens if the Beckham-Donovan-Ruiz partnership delivers the magic, but MLS decides to play hardball with the Galaxy next year? (Hey, it could happen. No really. Stop laughing.) There’s no way we could afford three DP slots on the open market.
But that’s a problem for next year. For now our issues are:
1) Can Carlos Ruiz deliver the goods, and
2) Can we afford to build a good enough team around the Big Three to actually win games?
Leave comments and tell us what you think.
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



Good News on the grandfathering- the league made it for the length of the contract that was signed pre-DP era.
Bad News on Ruiz is that he is a bit of a discipline problem. I seem to recall once or twice he went on unauthorized trip to Miami for rehabbing and has left in the middle of the season without telling team officials where he was going. Supposedly in 2006 there was a locker room division between the ‘gringos’ and ‘latinos’ that has since healed (probably had more to do with the old coach). Morrow decided to give him the captains arm band to make him more responcible to the team. That experiment did not work. Dallas is not one of the teams I follow as closely as others but the fans appear to be glad to see the back of him.
Some say Dallas played better without him. Some say that his game is highly reliant on speed and he doesn’t put a lot of effort on fitness so age will catch up to him faster than it does with other players. Maybe he’ll prove everyone wrong and a change of scenery is what he needs. Maybe he’ll be an absolute basketcase and lockerroom cancer. Or maybe he’ll just have another unspectacular year marred by incidents that makes you think he’s ok but not worth it.
Posted from
United States

-



I think you’re being a little harsh Laurie. Pescadito is a player that everyone hates unless he’s on your team. I GUARANTEE you most Fire fans hated Blanco until he joined Chicago, and you should see how they love him over here. (And no, my Guatemalan ethnicity is not a factor in my opinion. Ruiz dives and scores, that’s what he does.)
Look, the LA Galaxy were the joke of MLS last season, and with all due respect, looking bad in this league is pretty hard to do. You’ve getting a proven goal scorer who coincidently SCORED THE GOAL TO GIVE YOU A TITLE AND IS A FORMER MVP. Sorry, there should be no tears will be shed by me.
Posted from
United States

-



I think he’s going to be a big distraction for the team. His style of play is not what the Galaxy needs. The team needs a fast striker willing to fight up top and he is not going to do this. We’ve seen this time and time again with Dallas along with his acting skills on the field.
He’s not a bad player by any means and he can certainly disrupt a defense with his antics, but he’s a despicable person

Posted from
United States

-



“Look, the LA Galaxy were the joke of MLS last season, and with all due respect, looking bad in this league is pretty hard to do. You’ve getting a proven goal scorer who coincidently SCORED THE GOAL TO GIVE YOU A TITLE AND IS A FORMER MVP. Sorry, there should be no tears will be shed by me.”
The Galaxy were the joke of the season, are you kidding me! Didn’t you see some of the other teams or refereeing? Last season wasn’t such a great year for the fish either in terms of goals and play making. He’s past his prime and shouldn’t have been picked up by any team let alone the Galaxy. Simple as that!
Posted from
United States

-



Best Ruiz comment so far: Ruiz dives and scores, that’s what he does.
Maybe if I can see the second part working in my favor I won’t mind the first part so much? It could happen, right?
^^^ Trying to be positive here.
Posted from
United States

-



Were there worse teams Glen? Sure, but they didn’t have pundits across the world AND the US calling them a pub side, and if you consider they they were calling themselves the crown jewel they certainly didn’t live up to that billing.
I think it’s a fresh change for Ruiz, a new coach, in a club that he played a kew role in years ago - who’s to say what could happen? He certainly is a better bet than the pie-eater Pavone. I mean come on, Beckham crossing to Ruiz with the speed of Donovan?
My point is this: people will go on and on about what a diver he is, blah blah blah, and those things are all true. It’s what he does, he’s not the only player to do it. But he has a proven track record in this league and on paper it’s a move that makes sense, and if I was an LA Galaxy fan I would feel a little bit better going into the season.
Posted from
United States

-



Galaxy fans will probably find that Ruiz dives less this year than they thought he did during his time with Dallas. And equally or even more than Beckham, I’m looking forward to his collaboration with Donovan. How many times during the last few years has Landon made the killer pass to someone who was incapable of getting a shot off or getting it on frame. Sure there are plenty of problems the team must still solve, but it’s starting to look like it might be fun.
Posted from
United States

-



“Were there worse teams Glen? Sure, but they didn’t have pundits across the world AND the US calling them a pub side”
your still kidding right
why would you listen to the so called pundits from other parts of the world. they hate US soccer no matter what happens here. But this “pub” team worked over some of the so-called good teams towards the end of the season.Again I dispise the Fish, but he could get on the end of some of those great crosses and do some damage. I’m still going to be a Galaxy fan no matter who’s on the team and support them.
Posted from
United States

-



Glen, I promise I’m not going there, really :), if anything I’m trying to support the Galaxy’s move here.
Let’s say this: the Galaxy woefully underperformed last season. This move for Ruiz makes sense. Is it guaranteed to be successful? No. But it makes sense. If anything, Cobi Jones more than likely had a huge say in this.
Ruiz dives. If he can score goals and help the Galaxy get to the playoffs, it will have been a great move.
Posted from
United States

-



Simply Put:
If Ruiz gets his stuff together, and plays like the Ruiz we all knew and loved once…Then The MLS is in for “a RUDD” AWAKENING….
But if were getting the Ruiz we all known for the last few years… Then God Help us….!Posted from
United States

-



Has anyone commended Laurie? You should all be ashamed. Unbiased accomplished!
Posted from
United States

-



Thanks, Marcos. Praise wasn’t my goal, but it feels good nonetheless, particularly after the day I’ve had otherwise.

Posted from
United States

-



I’m with you on this one, Laurie! (and Glen) Effing Ruiz! His style of play is a disgrace to the beautiful game. He is a rough and tumble player that, more often than not, consistently crosses the line of fair play. On the plus side, Beckham will probably get more free kicks around the box and Albright is happy to get his old roomate and friend back. I still would have preferred someone other that this “flop artist” striker.
Posted from
United States

-



I hate this guy. He’s a dirty player, with dirty tactics, fouls, and dives. I hope Ruud Gullit puts him in his place the moment he tries to start up with an attitude.
We should have gotten Arturo Alvarez. If this was for they increased fans/money, they should know that there are more Salvadorans than Guatemalans in LA. But thats besides the point, Alvarez is young, talented, and a possible national team prospect. I just got off the phone with my cousin and we are both pissed about this.
At least we still have over 3 months to trade/sell him to some other suckers…
Posted from
United States

-



I have no idea how the Galaxy will have enough players and manage to keep their team under the salary cap. I suppose the league will probably change the rules for the Galaxy like they have been doing. Lalas can get all the expensive players he wants but he will still struggle to form a competitive team because he has yet to prove himself…how he still has a job i have no idea.
I think the Galaxy need to stop looking for expensive players who are supposed to play well and then fail to meet expectations and start looking for younger talent that wants to prove that they can play at this level. Sometimes the desire to prove ones worth can go farther than a history of good play.
Good luck LA i think you are going to need it.
Posted from
United States

Comments are closed












