<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Donovon Ricketts = Save of the week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lagalaxy.theoffside.com/player-news/donovon-ricketts-save-of-the-week.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lagalaxy.theoffside.com/player-news/donovon-ricketts-save-of-the-week.html</link>
	<description>LA Galaxy Soccer Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://lagalaxy.theoffside.com/player-news/donovon-ricketts-save-of-the-week.html#comment-36754</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lagalaxy.theoffside.com/player-news/donovon-ricketts-save-of-the-week.html#comment-36754</guid>
		<description>In the interest of covering all of our players (excuse me, playas) responsibly, shouldn&#039;t this blog be addressing the use of Beckham&#039;s image imprinted on condoms being sold at the Thyssen-Bornemisza museum in Madrid? This raises so MANY questions. Doesn&#039;t the manager have any say over whose penis Becks covers? (sorry, couldn&#039;t resist) The artwork used is of Becks sleeping, can this be the most arousing? Galaxy fans would probably agree not. Wouldn&#039;t imprinting weaken the condom? If we are going to send our boys in, shouldn&#039;t it be only with the finest equipment? I always think so. What about the Galaxy&#039;s image rights? Is there a demand to be satisfied at the Home Depot concession stand (or behind it)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interest of covering all of our players (excuse me, playas) responsibly, shouldn&#8217;t this blog be addressing the use of Beckham&#8217;s image imprinted on condoms being sold at the Thyssen-Bornemisza museum in Madrid? This raises so MANY questions. Doesn&#8217;t the manager have any say over whose penis Becks covers? (sorry, couldn&#8217;t resist) The artwork used is of Becks sleeping, can this be the most arousing? Galaxy fans would probably agree not. Wouldn&#8217;t imprinting weaken the condom? If we are going to send our boys in, shouldn&#8217;t it be only with the finest equipment? I always think so. What about the Galaxy&#8217;s image rights? Is there a demand to be satisfied at the Home Depot concession stand (or behind it)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

