

Ooh! Look! It’s TWO Trashy, Tasteless Posh and Becks Pics
By: Laurie | July 12th, 2007
What can I say? I’m ending my Beckham-free period with a vengeance. These are from a photo spread in “W” magazine. Whatever that is. Fashion, apparently — not in my realm of expertise. Or interest. But they do delightful sleazy photos.
Don’t you just love the cheap motel aspect, complete with naugahyde chair and rumpled harvest-gold bedspread? How long has it been, do you think, since Posh and Becks were so desperate that they just couldn’t control themselves and had to stop at a by-the-hour motel where they probably don’t change the sheets between visitors? Yesterday, maybe?
I found this at david beckham fans-online. Click here for more of the same.
And next we have the snarling “How DARE you take a photo of us as we’re about to get up to no good on the hood of our old, battered car!” photo. Realistic, no?
Oh, and one more Beckham thing, for the record. Posh denies the whole diamond-encrusted vibrator thing. (Which remember, by the way, I got from the relatively legitimate LA Times. I don’t make these things up. No, really.)
“It isn’t true,” Victoria said, her voice calm and measured. “We do buy each other nice things,” she admitted, but some things get exaggerated. “I don’t have a diamond-encrusted vibrator.”
Some things get exaggerated. Okay. So maybe it’s just rubies and emeralds?
Some Related Galaxy Posts:
-
Laurie
-
Max B
-
Laurie
-
Laurie
-
Laurie
-
chris g











